13.1 C
Delhi
Monday, December 9, 2024
HomeBusinessRegulationUS Bitcoin ETF Takes Center Stage In South Korea Elections

US Bitcoin ETF Takes Center Stage In South Korea Elections



Coingape Staff

South Korea’s upcoming parliamentary election is notable for the emphasis placed on crypto-related policies by major political parties. President Yoon Suk Yeol’s People Power Party has made a significant promise to delay the implementation of a digital-asset tax. This move is seen as an attempt to garner support from the burgeoning crypto investor community. Conversely, the opposition Democratic Party has pledged to remove restrictions on exchange-traded funds (ETFs), including those linked to US Bitcoin products.

This commitment signals a potential shift in regulatory stance towards embracing crypto-related financial instruments. The significance of these promises lies in the substantial presence of crypto traders in South Korea, where over 6 million individuals, constituting more than 10% of the population, actively engage in crypto trading. The outcome of the election could be swayed by the appeal of these policies to the crypto community, indicating the growing influence of digital assets on South Korean politics.

ETF Controversy and Regulatory Challenges

The controversy surrounding ETFs directly investing in Bitcoin has sparked discussions and regulatory scrutiny in both the US and South Korea. While the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has given its approval for such ETFs, South Korea’s securities regulator has raised concerns about potential legal violations associated with brokering these products locally. This regulatory uncertainty has had a ripple effect on stock markets and prompted political parties to address the issue as part of their election agendas.

In response to the challenges posed by regulatory ambiguity, promises have been made by political parties to postpone planned taxes on crypto gains. This highlights the critical role of regulatory decisions in shaping the landscape of the crypto market. South Koreans, known for their active participation in crypto trading, have displayed a preference for smaller cryptocurrencies, further complicating the regulatory landscape and underscoring the need for clarity and consistency in regulations.

Also Read: Massive Bitcoin Whale Accumulation Ahead of Halving, BTC Price Rally Ahead?

Crypto Risks and Regulatory Framework

The speculative nature of the crypto market exposes investors to significant risks, as evidenced by past incidents such as the collapse of Luna and TerraUSD tokens in 2022. The implosion of Do Kwon’s Luna and TerraUSD tokens resulted in losses exceeding $40 billion, serving as a stark reminder of the inherent risks associated with crypto investments. These events have underscored the importance of implementing robust investor protection measures and establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework.

Both major political parties in South Korea have proposed wider regulation plans aimed at safeguarding investors and promoting market stability. Recent crackdowns by South Korean financial regulators on virtual assets, including a more scrutinized approach to token listings on centralized exchanges (CEXs), highlight the need for seamless regulations to ensure the safety and integrity of the crypto market. Despite skepticism from US officials, South Korea and Asia are witnessing a growing acceptance of crypto, with expectations mounting for the eventual approval of spot-crypto ETFs.

Also Read: AI Chatbots in Trouble as People Demand Copyright for Data

✓ Share:

CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.

The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





➜ Source

RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular

Recent Comments